Appendix P – Ethical Argument

342
  • After WWII, the world was shocked that doctors were willing to conduct medical experiments on human beings.
  • The German doctors’ defense was that they were doing it for the benefit of society.And I’m sure it did benefit society.
  • So they developed the Nuremberg Code of medical ethics including:
    • Required is the voluntary, well-informed, understanding consent of the human subject in a full legal capacity.
  • If there was 50 deaths and 500,000 people saved, there would be a interesting ethical discussion if mandatory vaccination was justified.
  • But with 50 – 5,000 or more significant injuries or death from vaccines and somewhere between 0.5 and perhaps 200 potential annual deaths from measles,
    there is no ethical question. Mandatory vaccines are unethical. Fear mongering of the population is resulting in significant damage to the fabric of our community with
    hundreds or even thousands of families suffering in silence.

Ethical Argument Cont.

  • The right to decline an unwanted medical intervention, free from coercion, is codified in Article 6 (Consent) of UNESCO’s 2005 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights:
    • “Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. (bolding mine)
    • “The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.”
    • 2005 UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
  • Were you aware the New York City implemented mandatory flu vaccines for nursery? Schools are fined $2,000 per child who is not vaccinated. Does that make sense to anyone, other than the vaccine manufacturers?