The following are the first two parts of Dr. Gil Shahar’s paper on vaccines which have been translated from the Hebrew. For original Hebrew – part 1 – חיסונים – ללא כל צנזורה, part 11 – חיסונים – ללא כל צנזורה חלק ב’ – לקרוא ולא להאמין; the following three parts (use google translate) can be found at part 111 – חיסונים – ללא כל צנזורה חלק ג and part iv – חיסונים ללא כל צנזורה -המתנה שחברות התרופות ומערכת הבריאות לא רוצים שתקבל, ethical argument – חיסונים ללא כל צנזורה – מדוע באמת אין מחקרים שבדקו את יחות החיסונים? והאם באמת לא מוסרי ולא אתי לבצע מחקרים כאלה?
Vaccines – without any censorship – part 1
Facts that the health system (really) does not want you to know
by Gil Yosef Shahar, M.D.
The vaccine controversy can not be ignored.
Especially in view of the current measles outbreak, which once again raised the issue of vaccinations to headlines.
Following the article “What your doctor will not tell you about measles,” which received more than 2900 shares on Facebook, I received many inquiries with questions about vaccines. People wanted to know how there might be people who oppose vaccines, when the whole world of science supports them openly and declares that vaccines have been tested in a large number of quality studies and have been found to be beyond doubt, and that the fear of “vaccine opponents” stems from opinions revolving around Facebook rather than science.
They wondered if all the doctors were lying.
This article will give you an answer.
In addition, on the occasion of the publication of the most important book ever written on vaccines (see below), I decided that this was the opportunity to bring you some facts about vaccines.
Facts that the health system really does not want you to know.
Facts that will give you a real answer to the question of why there are “vaccine opponents” and whether their concerns about vaccines are based on science or science fiction…
I will start by saying, I am not against vaccines as an ideology.
Vaccinations have advantages. There is no doubt about that.
But they also have risks. There is no doubt about that either.
I’m not against vaccines as an ideology.
I’m for the truth.
So here it is before you, as I have never introduced it publicly.
Without any censorship.
Vaccination is a medical procedure, just like amniocentesis, colonoscopy, tonsillectomy, and more.
The basic right of every person, which is also enshrined in the patient’s rights law, is called the right to informed consent.
Informed consent means that the patient should be given all the relevant information about the medical procedure he is about to undergo.
From its benefits to risks and damages that may occur following the procedure. Some of the information relevant to the patient, in order to make a decision with informed consent, is related to the safety of the procedure.
Even if there is no proven evidence of damage due to the procedure, if the procedure has not been examined in quality controlled and appropriate clinical trials, the patient has to know about it.
If this is not told, the meaning of this figure is that the patient actually serves as an participant in an unofficial experiment, without his knowledge and without his consent…
The concealment of such information about the quality of the studies done on the procedure means denying the right of informed consent from the patient.
When it comes to injecting substances into the body, informed consent also means knowing the range of injected substances, their safety according to scientific research and what the risks are.
When a number of medical procedures are performed in a given period of time, even if each procedure separately has studies that prove the safety of the procedure, the safety of all procedures should be checked at the same time to ensure that their combination does not cause any unexpected damage following each procedure separately. This is especially true when injecting substances into the body. Materials that accumulate in tissue from injection to injection. Even if one injection was found to be safe, it can not be said that repeated injections are safe, based on the fact that each injection was found to be safe.
Vaccines – without any censorship – part 11
To read and to disbelieve!
by Gil Yosef Shahar, M.D.
Following the article “Vaccines- Without Censorship” [part 1] (if you have not read it – it is necessary to read in order to understand the course of events), I have received hundreds of responses.
With your permission, I will not relate to the irrelevant and scathing responses.
But there were also some practical responses, some of them from doctors, who combined studies that compared vaccines to a real placebo, sterile water (Saline), as proof that I had been wrong and misleading in what I wrote.
Before I respond to these claims one by one in an orderly and matter-of-fact manner, a short introduction should be given:
My claim was that vaccinations given to babies in Israel did not undergo proper safety studies, required. In this regard, a basic and important point must be clarified. To prove that vaccines are safe for babies at the age of two months, studies should be done on babies at the age of two months. Research on adults, even if done with a saline placebo group, will not prove that the vaccine is safe for babies.
This is understandable by means of common sense, but you also have physiological reasons that are easy to understand:
1. In some vaccinations, the dose given to two-month-old infants is the same as the amount given to an adult. In other words, the amount of stabilizing substances, preservatives, and adjuvants (which stimulate the immune system to react more actively) is the same dose for baby’s vaccination as it is for adult vaccination.
You do not have to be a doctor to understand that a study that shows that the vaccine is safe for a person weighing 70 kg does not prove that the same amount of potent substances will be safe for a 3-4 kg baby. You just have to common sense.
2. The brain develops during infancy. Some substances may not affect a mature brain, but may damage the brain during its developmental phase.
Therefore research on adults will not prove safety of the material for infants. Again, just common sense.
3. Symptoms such as SIDS, loss of eye contact and regression to autism do not occur in adults.Epileptic seizures occur in children and adults,
however SIDS, loss of eye contact and regressive autism only occur in babies and children.To prove that vaccines do not increase the risk of
these effects, studies should be carried out on infants. You do not have to be a scientist to understand this, it’s common sense.