The CDC has an 80 page guide1 for using their RT-PCR test to detect SARS Cov2 virus, known as Covid-19. One would expect that the CDC would have an isolated copy of the virus in order to determine effectiveness of the PCR test and know whether or not a person is infected with Covid-19. That’s why it’s surprising that buried in the document (on page 42 of the revised December 2020 version) the CDC admits that it has no isolated sample of the Covid-19 virus.
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
Another surprise is how the original PCR test to detect Covid-19, developed by German scientist Dr. Christian Drosten and colleagues at the Berlin Virology Institute and accepted by the WHO, did not have an isolated Covid-19 virus available either.2 Here’s what they did (emphasis added):
“In the present case of 2019-nCoV, virus isolates or samples from infected patients have so far not become available to the international public health community. We report here on the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation, designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.”3
In November 2020, a group of scientists sent a letter to the Eurosurveillance Editorial Board asking them to retract the Drosten paper because it is “severely flawed with respect to its biomolecular and methodological design”.4 It has not been retracted.
Prof. Saeed Qureshi explains how the Covid-19 pandemic was able to happen:
“Perhaps the absurdity of the whole situation is that no one isolated and identified the virus (the poked-material), but a test was developed to measure the unknown virus. Only physicians or virologists can pull such a trick. In reality, developing tests fall under analytical chemistry science; however, the job was never assigned to it but kept within the medicine area.
“If chemistry scientists and laboratories had assigned the task of isolating the virus and developing its test, the pandemic would never have existed from day one. Scientifically, it is impossible to develop and validate a test without having the reference material in hand – isolated virus, i.e., no virus specimen, no valid test, no pandemic. Therefore, the declaration of the virus and its disease certainly reflect ignorance about the science of medicines.”5
Considering the above, it is no wonder that scientists and others question the Covid narrative.
The following paper, given to Rodef Shalom 613 by the author, who holds a degree in molecular biology, provide further insight into the situation.
The COVID Story
Oct – Dec 2020 (Revised with additions Jan 2021)
- According to the mainstream narrative, on the 31st of December, 2019, the Chinese government announced that starting around December, many people in China got ill with a mysterious pneumonia. In early January 2020, the Chinese government announced that this mysterious illness is caused by a coronavirus, and that its genome has been sequenced (in an incredibly short amount of time6), and then shared this genetic sequence with the rest of the world. Question: If anyone from the “West” would be asked if news from China is trustworthy, everyone would say “no”, but suddenly in the case of this flu, everyone believed the story of the Chinese government without question. Then subsequently when this illness was found in other parts of the world, no one bothered looking for other causes for this illness, since they believed that the Chinese government had already explained and proven this illness’s cause7. Therefore, no other country other than China has published any research papers trying to prove the existence of this virus. Why are we trusting China?
But a much more powerful question can be asked. The media reports tell us that:
- There are many people who have been diagnosed with the COVID illness, but have no virus8
- That over half of the people with this illness who had the virus, but now no longer have the virus, nonetheless continue to have the illness (they display symptoms, some steady, some fluctuating), and in many cases acquire new symptoms9
These three abovementioned points clearly show that there is absolutely no correlation at all between this virus and this illness. Since someone can have this illness without the presence of the virus10 and the virus can be present without the person having the illness, that means that there is no correlation between this virus and this illness11, and the virus can be present without the person having the illness, that means that there is no correlation between this virus and this illness12, and if there is no correlation between the virus and the illness, then for sure there is no causation between the virus and the illness (meaning that this virus is not the cause of this illness).
Read more here.
Feature image by Elliot Alderson from Pixabay
Footnotes
